REGISTER   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   E-MAIL ALERTS   |   HELP |   SIGN OUT    

Home   |   Print edition   |   Advertising  |   Buyers Guide   |   Jobs   |   Events calendar   |   RSS feeds
  • Table of contents
  • Past issues

yellow star Featured Jobs

  • Search jobs
  • Post jobs
Letters

An adventure in relative time-keeping

March 2007, page 16

An adventure in relative time-keeping
I enjoyed Daniel Kleppner's Reference Frame about the relativistic effects of elevation on precise clocks (PHYSICS TODAY, March 2006, page 10). He would be amused with an experiment I did with my kids last year.

The year 2005 was the widely publicized 100th anniversary of Einstein's first paper on relativity and the lesser-known 50th anniversary of Louis Essen's first cesium clock. To celebrate, I created Project GREAT (General Relativity Einstein/Essen Anniversary Test), perhaps the first "kitchen science" relativity experiment.

As a collector of vintage and modern atomic clocks, I discovered it was possible, using gear found at home, to convert our family minivan into a mobile high-precision time laboratory, complete with batteries, power converters, time interval counters, three children, and three cesium clocks (see photograph). We drove as high as we could up Mount Rainier, the volcano near Seattle, Washington, and parked there for two days. The trip was continuously logged with the global positioning system; the net altitude gain was +1340 meters.

Graph: Atomic Clock vs. Cesium Clocks
Given the terrestrial blueshift of 1.1 × 10-16 per meter mentioned by Kleppner and integrating our altitude profile, we predicted the round-trip time dilation to be +22 nanoseconds. This is remarkably close to what we experimentally observed when, after we returned, the ensemble of portable cesium clocks was again compared with atomic clocks left at home (see graph).

Instead of fanciful stories of rocket ships and twins, the kids got a hands-on introduction to general relativity with real clocks and a family road trip. Furthermore, by being at high altitude for the weekend, we experienced more time together, relatively speaking. It was the best extra 22 nanoseconds I've ever spent with the kids.

So, yes, not only do we live in a time when atomic clocks are altimeters, but when relativity is child's play.

Tom Van Baak
(tvb@leapsecond.com)
LeapSecond.com
Bellevue, Washington

 

  • Article Tools
  • Enlarge text   Enlarge text
  • Shrink text   Shrink text
  • Printer-friendly formatPrinter-friendly format
  • Download PDFDownload PDF
  • E-mail this articleE-mail this article
  • Comment on this articleWrite a letter to the editor
  • Related from the archive
  • Time Too Good to Be True
  • Free this month
  • Solar energy conversion
  • Experimenting with plagiarism detection on the arXiv
  • New Books
  • New Products
  • Letters
  • Most popular articles
  • li>Charles Sanders Peirce and the first absolute measurement standard
    December 2009
  • What causes road noise?
    December 2009
  • Stiff-string theory: Richard Feynman on piano tuning
    December 2009
  • LHC now world's most powerful collider
    December 2009

Request product info

 

 


SERVICES
Physics Today Jobs
Physics Today Buyers Guide
Research Today
NEWS
News Picks
We Hear That Society News
Event Calendar
Obituaries
THE MAGAZINE
This month in print
Past Issues
Institutional subscriptions
Information for advertsers
READER SERVICE
Register
Sign in
Subscribe
Email alert
MORE INFO
Contact us
About Physics Today
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Copyright © 2009 by the American Institute of Physics - All rights reserved